Hard Working Traditional Values With A Dash of Fun

Hard Working Traditional Values With A Dash of Fun

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Will New Oregon Governor Become a Polygamist?

Oregon's Governor Kitzhaber resigned earlier this month under a cloud of corruption. He was replaced by Oregon Secretary of State Kate Brown. For some reason the media finds it important to report that Governor Brown is the first openly bisexual governor in United States history.

The LGBT community is eagerly awaiting the day later this year when the Supreme Court will likely declare same sex marriage to be legal. What they are less eager to support is marriage equality for bisexuals. By definition, someone who is bisexual is attracted to both men and women. In the spirit of allowing people to marry who they love, why shouldn't a bisexual such as Governor Brown be allowed to marry a man and a woman? Governor Brown is currently married to a man, but if her husband is okay with the relationship, why shouldn't they be allowed to marry a woman? Wouldn't it be wrong to deny such happiness to a bisexual?

Of course, you don't find the LGBT community demanding the legal right of bisexual marriage with three or more people. Doesn't this go against their prime value of diversity? They should be all for this, right?

Being excellent at the public relations game, they suppress championing polygamy, knowing it will cost them support from the general public. Same sex marriage has never been about being able to marry who you love. The goal has been to normalize LGBT behavior. If gays can get legally married, than their gay lifestyle choices should be acceptable by everyone. Gay men will marry at a rate far lower than their hetero counterparts.

Children do best when raised by their married parents. Having a mother and a father has been shown in study after study to be the optimal environment to raise children. When the LGBT community hijacks the meaning of marriage, it is a selfish, anti-children action. They could get all the legal rights needed by advocating for civil unions, but that would not result in forcing their values on others that support traditional marriage.

Related story: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly (Gay Version)

If you liked this post, be sure to share it by selecting one of the share buttons below.

If you would like to get a notice of future posts, choose the Follow option at the bottom of this blog.

Monday, February 23, 2015

Iwo Jima - 70 Years Ago Today

US Marines raised the flag over Iwo Jima on February 23, 1945.

While modern Hollywood honors itself and its narcissism in the recent Academy Awards program, they pretty much ignored the accomplishments of American Sniper, a film seen by more people than all the other best picture nominees combined.

Hollywood has little love for the military, despite the fact that without the sacrifices of men such as those on Iwo Jima (6,800 KIA), they would not have the freedoms to make the many questionable movies that they foist on the public month after month.

Before Hollywood was hijacked by liberals, you would regularly find movies that reflected the views of American citizens. Many big stars served in the armed forces. In 1947 The Best Years of Our Lives, a movie about servicemen returning home after WWII, won 7 Oscars including Best Picture. In 1949 Sands of Iwo Jima garnered a Best Actor nomination for John Wayne and 3 other nominations.

Modern films that portray our servicemen in a positive light, are far less common, despite the fact that pro-military films do better at the box office than the anti-military films Hollywood prefers to make.

For those that would enjoy a modern take on the Iwo Jima campaign, you can watch Clint Eastwood's Flags of our Fathers (2006). I would actually recommend readingthe book by the same name that was written by James Bradley, a son of one of the soldiers that was in the famous flag raising picture. It is one of the very best books about World War II.

If you liked this post, be sure to share it by selecting one of the share buttons below.
If you would like to get a notice of future posts, choose the Follow option at the bottom of this blog.

Monday, February 9, 2015

Obama: Father of ISIS

This is the month we celebrate American presidents, especially Abraham Lincoln (born February 12) and George Washington (born February 22).

George Washington is rightly acknowledged as "The Father of His Country". Washington's management of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War is the main reason America exists today. We celebrate the signers of the Declaration of Independence as those responsible for the birth of America, but a bunch of lawyers signing a peace of paper would have meant very little had not Washington expertly avoided military defeat from a much more powerful British army.

No Washington, no America.

Washington now has a rival in a president who is responsible for the creation of a new nation. An easy argument can be made that Barack Obama is the reason ISIS exists today and here is why.

At the beginning of the Syrian civil war, the tyrant leader Bashar al-Assad was challenged by rebels friendly to the west. Obama refused to get involved. Remember the "don't cross the red line" warning that Obama backed down from? With al-Assad and the rebels distracted fighting each other, ISIS was able to create a base in Syria unchallenged.

Even worse, Obama messed up big time when he failed to sign a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government to allow American troops to remain in Iraq, just as we left troops in Germany, Japan, Korea, and Croatia to help keep the peace. Leading military and national security advisors told the president it would be folly to pull troops out and allow players with anti-America interests to make mischief. Obama decided that politics was more important than national security. His left wing base would not stand for American soldiers staying behind where they might be killed and cause PR problems with a war weary American public. Obama wanted the credit for pulling the troops out of Iraq and ending the war.

What he ends up getting credit for is being "The Father of ISIS".

Sadly, America will probably have to send troops back to clean up the mess that should never have happened.

If you liked this post, be sure to share it by selecting one of the share buttons below.
If you would like to get a notice of future posts, choose the Follow option at the bottom of this blog.

Friday, February 6, 2015

Lyin' Brian Williams

NBC News Anchor Brian Williams is catching flack now because he lied about catching flack in 2003. Reports say that Williams has repeatedly shared a story that he was on a helicopter that came under fire during the Iraq War in 2003. Turns out he was on a different helicopter that followed the damaged bird by an hour.

Showing up at an accident an hour after it happened does not make you part of the accident.

Williams's apology also turns out to be just more spinning. He said:

"On this broadcast last week, in an effort to honor and thank a veteran who protected me and so many others after a ground-fire incident in the desert during the Iraq War invasion, I made a mistake in recalling the events of twelve years ago. . . . I want to apologize. I said I was traveling in an aircraft that was hit by RPG fire; I was instead in a following aircraft. We all landed after the ground-fire incident and spent two harrowing nights in a sandstorm in the Iraq desert. This was a bungled attempt by me to thank one special veteran, and by extension, our brave military men and women, veterans everywhere, those who have served while I did not. I hope they know they have my greatest respect, and also now my apology."

Notice this "apology" does not mention his helicopter arrived an hour after the damaged helicopter landed. He also did not explain why he shared this story in settings that made no effort to "honor and thank a veteran who protected me." Williams told the story on The Letterman Show and never mentioned any veteran.

It is clear that Williams's story was a way to puff up his war street cred.

So far NBC is taking no action. Williams may get away with lying because he is darling of the establishment left who promotes the narrative the establishment left wants people to hear.

It does raise the issue that media can't be trusted to tell the truth and it won't do anything about a "trusted" newsman willing to lie in order to look good.

If you liked this post, be sure to share it by selecting one of the share buttons below.
If you would like to get a notice of future posts, choose the Follow option at the bottom of this blog.

Monday, February 2, 2015

Huckabee Right About Gay Choice

Potential presidential candidate Mike Huckabee ruffled some boa feathers when he made a statement a few days ago sharing his belief that a gay lifestyle is a choice, not an uncontrolled destiny.

"People can be my friends who have lifestyles that are not necessarily my lifestyle. I don't shut people out of my circle or out of my life because they have a different point of view. I don't drink alcohol, but gosh -- a lot of my friends, maybe most of them do. You know, I don't use profanity, but believe me, I've got a lot of friends who do. Some people really like classical music and ballet and opera -- it's not my cup of tea."

This comment has got a lot of LGBT activities upset because it challenges one of the big lies they are very successful at promoting. The LGBT community would like everyone to believe that LGBT orientation is beyond anyone's control, on par with race or gender. They want people to believe that if you are LGBT, you are born that way. This is patently false.

It is real easy to prove that an LGBT lifestyle is not genetic. All we have to do is study identical twins. If there was a "gay" gene that made people born that way, both identical twins would be gay 100% of the time. The actual results are not even close.

We also know that men who identify themselves as attracted to other men do not always decide to choose a gay lifestyle. Last month the TLC network ran a program called My Husband's Not Gay. It profiled gay men who choose to marry women instead of pursue same-sex relations. The program created an uproar in the LGBT community and they tried to get the program cancelled before it aired. (So much for diversity and tolerance.)

The strong reaction to any argument that would challenge the "being gay can't be controlled" lie reveals how important it is among LGBT activists for the truth to remain suppressed. It shows how important it is for the LGBT culture that biased and/or ignorant people are to accept this propaganda unchallenged. Being bisexual by definition shows people make choices, not that they are born that way. Also, a significant proportion of people who identify themselves as transgender will later change back to their true gender.

Huckabee is right and should not be treated as a Bible thumping ignoramus. The facts are on his side.

If you liked this post, be sure to share it by selecting one of the share buttons below.
If you would like to get a notice of future posts, choose the Follow option at the bottom of this blog.